<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://wiki.themailhandlerunderground.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CIM_Section_30.3D</id>
	<title>CIM Section 30.3D - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wiki.themailhandlerunderground.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CIM_Section_30.3D"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.themailhandlerunderground.org/index.php?title=CIM_Section_30.3D&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-29T05:30:14Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.themailhandlerunderground.org/index.php?title=CIM_Section_30.3D&amp;diff=665&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Created page with &quot;This provision establishes the burden of proof required where management impasses an existing provision of a currently effective LMOU – that management “shall have the burden of establishing that continuation of the existing provision would represent an unreasonable burden to the Postal Service.” Note that the union does not bear the same burden when it seeks to change a presently effective LMOU provision.&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.themailhandlerunderground.org/index.php?title=CIM_Section_30.3D&amp;diff=665&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2022-01-16T01:26:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;This provision establishes the burden of proof required where management impasses an existing provision of a currently effective LMOU – that management “shall have the burden of establishing that continuation of the existing provision would represent an unreasonable burden to the Postal Service.” Note that the union does not bear the same burden when it seeks to change a presently effective LMOU provision.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This provision establishes the burden of proof required where management impasses an existing provision of a currently effective LMOU – that management “shall have the burden of establishing that continuation of the existing provision would represent an unreasonable burden to the Postal Service.” Note that the union does not bear the same burden when it seeks to change a presently effective LMOU provision.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>