NPMHU 2019 National Agreement: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 165: Line 165:
1.6.A of the 2019 National Agreement and where such work hours are not de minimis, the employee(s) whom management would have assigned the work  
1.6.A of the 2019 National Agreement and where such work hours are not de minimis, the employee(s) whom management would have assigned the work  
shall be paid for the time involved at the applicable rate.</div></div>
shall be paid for the time involved at the applicable rate.</div></div>
Question: What is the remedy when a supervisor performs bargaining unit work
in violation of Section 1.6A?
Answer: Except where the time involved is de minimis, the employee(s) who
would have been assigned the bargaining unit work will be paid at the applicable
rate for the additional work hours that would have been assigned to the
bargaining unit employee(s) but for the violation.
Question: Does a union representative have a basis for filing a grievance when
he/she believes that a supervisor is performing bargaining unit work in violation
of Section 1.6, where the work in question is properly assigned to another craft?
Answer: In keeping with the exclusions outlined in Section 1.2, in those
circumstances in which there is no dispute that the work in question is properly
assigned to another craft (e.g., the work is properly assigned to the clerk craft
under the provisions of RI 399), the union representative would have no basis to
file a grievance over the supervisor’s performance of that work.


== ARTICLE 2 NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CIVIL RIGHTS ==
== ARTICLE 2 NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CIVIL RIGHTS ==

Navigation menu