CIM Section 8.5E

From The Mail Handler Underground
Revision as of 02:55, 15 January 2022 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This language is intended to serve as a guideline for local management when considering excusing individual employees from overtime work because of "exceptional" situations. </p><p> Consequently, the four examples listed in the parentheses are merely illustrative of the kinds of situations in which management should give full consideration to excusing an employee(s) from overtime. However, as Arbitrator Sylvester Garrett has held in National Award NC-C 7933, dated Januar...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This language is intended to serve as a guideline for local management when considering excusing individual employees from overtime work because of "exceptional" situations.

Consequently, the four examples listed in the parentheses are merely illustrative of the kinds of situations in which management should give full consideration to excusing an employee(s) from overtime. However, as Arbitrator Sylvester Garrett has held in National Award NC-C 7933, dated January 8, 1979, Section 8.5E "reflects an intent to confer relatively broad discretion on local management to excuse employees from overtime work for any one of a number of legitimate reasons 'based on equity'."

In denying a grievance which challenged the use of Form 3971 when an employee sought to be excused from scheduled overtime due to illness, Arbitrator R. Bloch ruled:

The use of the form in question in these particular circumstances does not fall squarely within the purpose for which the form was designed. From a purely technical standpoint, the employee is not requesting sick leave when he or she leaves, unexpectedly, from an overtime assignment. . . But neither may it be said that the use of the form for record keeping purposes is either unreasonable or prohibited by the labor agreement.

Source: National Arbitration Award H1M-3W-C 29228, Arbitrator R. Bloch, dated September 5, 1985.